EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

ACALABRUTINIB IN THE TREATMENT OF RICHTER SYNDROME
Author(s): ,
Tatyana Byalik
Affiliations:
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russia;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russia;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russische Federatie;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Rússia;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Россия
,
Natalia Kokosadze
Affiliations:
pathomorphology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;pathomorphology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;pathomorphology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;pathomorphology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;pathomorphology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;pathomorphology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
,
Eugenia Paramonova
Affiliations:
oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
,
Dmitrii Semichev
Affiliations:
oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
,
Аkgul Odzharova
Affiliations:
radiology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;radiology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;radiology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;radiology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;radiology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;radiology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
,
Anastasia Semenova
Affiliations:
oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
,
Gayane Tumyan
Affiliations:
oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
,
Evgeniy Osmanov
Affiliations:
oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Russische Federatie;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Rússia;oncohematology,«N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology»,Moscow,Россия
Tatyana Byalik
Affiliations:
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russie, Fédération De;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russia;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russia;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Russische Federatie;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Rússia;Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),Moscow,Россия
EHA Library. Byalik T. 06/10/22; 358718; PB1861
Tatyana Byalik
Tatyana Byalik
Contributions
Abstract
References

Abstract: PB1861

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related disorders - Clinical

Background

Richter syndrome is a transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia into DLBCL, occurring in about 2-15% of patients (pts) with CLL. These patients have a very poor prognosis with an unsatisfactory response to immunochemotherapy (R-XT) and a short overall survival.  B-cell receptor signaling through Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is one of the essential growth pathways for CLL. Acalabrutinib (highly selective BTK inhibitor) has shown significant efficacy in relapsed/refractory and untreated CLL.

Aims
improving the results of treatment of patients with Richter syndrome

Methods
we reported 4 cases of Richter syndrome treated with acalabrutinib + R-СТ.

Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of 4 CLL pts who developed biopsy-proven DLBCL. The median time to transformation from CLL was 40,75 months (range 4-66). Clonality was not available testing in any pts. At the time of transformation, 2 pts were initially treated with R-CHOP with a suboptimal response, then acalabrutinib was added, 1 pt received 6 cycles of R-CHOP+ acalabrutinib and 1pt - 5 cycles R-CVP + acalabrutinib. The overall response (OR) was 75%:1 pt had a CR and 2 pts - PR. The pts who achieved OR are currently receiving acalabrutinib, 1 pt had progression of DLBCL after 15 months of acalabrutinib therapy. Acalabrutinib was well-tolerated; no patient required discontinuation as a result of adverse events.

At the time of CLL diagnosis (table1)

Age, y

75

28

64

34

Sex

M

F

M

F

   Rai st.

II

II

 

II

 

II

 

CLL therapy

Efficacy

Rituximab 2013 to 2015.

CR

none

6-G-FC in 2016  CR

6 FCR in 2020

CR

Time from CLL therapy to RS

66m

45m

48m

4m

Localization of DLBCL

Peripheral, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, stomach

Lymph nodes, nasal sinuses, upper palate

Retroperitoneal lymph nodes, colon

Tumor  of the tongue root

DLBCL subtype

GCB

 Non-GCB

Non-GCB

Non-GCB

At the time of DLBCL diagnosis (table 1- continuation)

 

1

2

3

4

Age, y

82

32

69

35

WBC ×109/L

5,53 х10х9/L

 

6,23х10х9/L

 

10,25х10х9/L

 

0,840 х10х9/L

 

 Hemoglobin, g/dL

12,4

11,6

10,7

6,6

Platelet count ×109/L 

178,0

294,0

120,0

41,0

LDH, U/L  

322

196

410

317

IGHV mutation status 

It is not possible to establish

Unmutated 

Unmutated 

 

It is not possible to establish

FISH

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Mutation TP53

No mutations .

No mutations

No mutations

No mutations

Mutation NOTCH1

-

Mutation c7544

No mutation

No mutation

RS prognosis score

2 (Intermediate)

1 (Low)

2 (Intermediate)

1 (Low)

Duration of acalabrutinib therapy (mon)

15

12

15

5

Best response

PR

CR

 Clinical benefit 

PR

Status at most recent follow-up 

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

Death 

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

 

Conclusion
 our experience with these patients suggests that acalabrutinib in combination with immunochemotherapy  has potential as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with Richter syndrome.

Keyword(s):

Abstract: PB1861

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related disorders - Clinical

Background

Richter syndrome is a transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia into DLBCL, occurring in about 2-15% of patients (pts) with CLL. These patients have a very poor prognosis with an unsatisfactory response to immunochemotherapy (R-XT) and a short overall survival.  B-cell receptor signaling through Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is one of the essential growth pathways for CLL. Acalabrutinib (highly selective BTK inhibitor) has shown significant efficacy in relapsed/refractory and untreated CLL.

Aims
improving the results of treatment of patients with Richter syndrome

Methods
we reported 4 cases of Richter syndrome treated with acalabrutinib + R-СТ.

Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of 4 CLL pts who developed biopsy-proven DLBCL. The median time to transformation from CLL was 40,75 months (range 4-66). Clonality was not available testing in any pts. At the time of transformation, 2 pts were initially treated with R-CHOP with a suboptimal response, then acalabrutinib was added, 1 pt received 6 cycles of R-CHOP+ acalabrutinib and 1pt - 5 cycles R-CVP + acalabrutinib. The overall response (OR) was 75%:1 pt had a CR and 2 pts - PR. The pts who achieved OR are currently receiving acalabrutinib, 1 pt had progression of DLBCL after 15 months of acalabrutinib therapy. Acalabrutinib was well-tolerated; no patient required discontinuation as a result of adverse events.

At the time of CLL diagnosis (table1)

Age, y

75

28

64

34

Sex

M

F

M

F

   Rai st.

II

II

 

II

 

II

 

CLL therapy

Efficacy

Rituximab 2013 to 2015.

CR

none

6-G-FC in 2016  CR

6 FCR in 2020

CR

Time from CLL therapy to RS

66m

45m

48m

4m

Localization of DLBCL

Peripheral, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, stomach

Lymph nodes, nasal sinuses, upper palate

Retroperitoneal lymph nodes, colon

Tumor  of the tongue root

DLBCL subtype

GCB

 Non-GCB

Non-GCB

Non-GCB

At the time of DLBCL diagnosis (table 1- continuation)

 

1

2

3

4

Age, y

82

32

69

35

WBC ×109/L

5,53 х10х9/L

 

6,23х10х9/L

 

10,25х10х9/L

 

0,840 х10х9/L

 

 Hemoglobin, g/dL

12,4

11,6

10,7

6,6

Platelet count ×109/L 

178,0

294,0

120,0

41,0

LDH, U/L  

322

196

410

317

IGHV mutation status 

It is not possible to establish

Unmutated 

Unmutated 

 

It is not possible to establish

FISH

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Mutation TP53

No mutations .

No mutations

No mutations

No mutations

Mutation NOTCH1

-

Mutation c7544

No mutation

No mutation

RS prognosis score

2 (Intermediate)

1 (Low)

2 (Intermediate)

1 (Low)

Duration of acalabrutinib therapy (mon)

15

12

15

5

Best response

PR

CR

 Clinical benefit 

PR

Status at most recent follow-up 

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

Death 

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

 

Conclusion
 our experience with these patients suggests that acalabrutinib in combination with immunochemotherapy  has potential as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with Richter syndrome.

Keyword(s):

Abstract: PB1861

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related disorders - Clinical

Background

Richter syndrome is a transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia into DLBCL, occurring in about 2-15% of patients (pts) with CLL. These patients have a very poor prognosis with an unsatisfactory response to immunochemotherapy (R-XT) and a short overall survival.  B-cell receptor signaling through Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is one of the essential growth pathways for CLL. Acalabrutinib (highly selective BTK inhibitor) has shown significant efficacy in relapsed/refractory and untreated CLL.

Aims
improving the results of treatment of patients with Richter syndrome

Methods
we reported 4 cases of Richter syndrome treated with acalabrutinib + R-СТ.

Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of 4 CLL pts who developed biopsy-proven DLBCL. The median time to transformation from CLL was 40,75 months (range 4-66). Clonality was not available testing in any pts. At the time of transformation, 2 pts were initially treated with R-CHOP with a suboptimal response, then acalabrutinib was added, 1 pt received 6 cycles of R-CHOP+ acalabrutinib and 1pt - 5 cycles R-CVP + acalabrutinib. The overall response (OR) was 75%:1 pt had a CR and 2 pts - PR. The pts who achieved OR are currently receiving acalabrutinib, 1 pt had progression of DLBCL after 15 months of acalabrutinib therapy. Acalabrutinib was well-tolerated; no patient required discontinuation as a result of adverse events.

At the time of CLL diagnosis (table1)

Age, y

75

28

64

34

Sex

M

F

M

F

   Rai st.

II

II

 

II

 

II

 

CLL therapy

Efficacy

Rituximab 2013 to 2015.

CR

none

6-G-FC in 2016  CR

6 FCR in 2020

CR

Time from CLL therapy to RS

66m

45m

48m

4m

Localization of DLBCL

Peripheral, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, stomach

Lymph nodes, nasal sinuses, upper palate

Retroperitoneal lymph nodes, colon

Tumor  of the tongue root

DLBCL subtype

GCB

 Non-GCB

Non-GCB

Non-GCB

At the time of DLBCL diagnosis (table 1- continuation)

 

1

2

3

4

Age, y

82

32

69

35

WBC ×109/L

5,53 х10х9/L

 

6,23х10х9/L

 

10,25х10х9/L

 

0,840 х10х9/L

 

 Hemoglobin, g/dL

12,4

11,6

10,7

6,6

Platelet count ×109/L 

178,0

294,0

120,0

41,0

LDH, U/L  

322

196

410

317

IGHV mutation status 

It is not possible to establish

Unmutated 

Unmutated 

 

It is not possible to establish

FISH

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

Mutation TP53

No mutations .

No mutations

No mutations

No mutations

Mutation NOTCH1

-

Mutation c7544

No mutation

No mutation

RS prognosis score

2 (Intermediate)

1 (Low)

2 (Intermediate)

1 (Low)

Duration of acalabrutinib therapy (mon)

15

12

15

5

Best response

PR

CR

 Clinical benefit 

PR

Status at most recent follow-up 

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

Death 

Аcalabrutinib therapy continues

 

Conclusion
 our experience with these patients suggests that acalabrutinib in combination with immunochemotherapy  has potential as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with Richter syndrome.

Keyword(s):

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies