![Dr. Edvan Crusoe](https://assets.multilearning.com/content/34/photo_user/91720.jpg?_cctrl=2022101408470202)
Contributions
Abstract: EP1286
Type: E-Poster Presentation
Session title: Stem cell transplantation - Clinical
Background
The combination of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, Dara, to the main induction protocols (VRd, VTd, VCd) significantly improved the response rate of TE NDMM before transplantation. However, there is a concern regarding the possible interference in the SC collection and bone marrow engraftment, since SC, to some degree, express CD38 on their surface. In the MAX Dara study, Dara-CTd protocol was used sequentially close to the pre- and post-autologous stem cell transplantation-(ASCT) (D-30 and D + 30), in order to take advantage of the molecule's action as an in vivo purge.
Aims
In this analysis, we examine the impact of the number of Dara doses administered pre-mobilization on CD34 cell count, SC apheresis yield, and post-ASCT engraftment.
Methods
This is a phase II, open-label single-center clinical trial. The original protocol was Dara-CTd for up to four 28-day induction cycles and Dara-Td for up to four 28 days consolidation cycles. C-1500mg oral (PO) per cycle, during cycles 1 to 4, T at 100-200mg PO on days 1 to 28, during cycles 1-8, (d) at 160mg PO per cycle, during cycles 1 - 8 and Dara at 16mg/Kg/dose intravenous (IV) on days 1,8,15 and 22 during cycles 1 - 2 and every other week in cycles 3 – 8. Because of the COVID pandemic we had to adapted the protocol and moving 5-6 consolidation cycles to be used as induction, increasing the total dose of Dara from 12 to 16 and the number of cycles from 4 to 6 before ASCT. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered alone for SC mobilization and plerixafor added based on day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 counts. The target of SC collection was to enable the performance of one ASCT (>2,5 x 106/kg). PMN and platelet engraftment post-ASCT was defined as the first day with sustained PMN count >1000 x 106/L and independence from platelet transfusion in the preceding 7 days with a count >20 x 109/L, respectively
Results
From a total of 21 pts that were included, 19 pts completed mobilization. 12 pts received 12 and 7 pts received 16 induction Dara doses, respectively. The median number (range) of days between the last dose of Dara infusion and SC harvest was 23 (16-63) days. A total of five (26%) pts received plerixafor during mobilization. More pts from Dara 16 doses needed plerixafor comparing with Dara 12 doses (42% vs 16%), but without difference between the groups. Pts underwent a median (range) of 1 (1-2) days of apheresis. The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the total group was 3.94×106/kg, and no difference was found between Dara 12 vs 16 doses (3.61×106/kg vs 4.01x106/kg), p=0.27. There was no difference in the number of SC collected considering the response rate after induction > or < VGPR, and the last day of Dara use > or < 30 days, before SC harvesting. Hematopoietic reconstitution rates were similar for Dara 12 vs 16 doses, a median (range) of 11.0 (9-13) vs 11.0 (11-14) days was required to achieve sustained ANC > 1000 cells/mm3, and a median (range) of 12.0 (9-14) vs 11.0 (8-16) days was required to achieve sustained platelets > 20,000 cells/mm3 without transfusion, respectively.
Conclusion
SC mobilization was feasible with Dara-CTd induction. Despite the more doses of Dara use before mobilization increases the need of plerixafor use, the SC number difference was not significant comparing Dara 12 vs 16 doses (p = 0.3). The infusion of Dara close to harvest did not interfere with SC collection. Adding DARA to CTd allowed successful transplantation in pts with TE NDMM.
Keyword(s): Monoclonal antibody, Multiple myeloma, Phase II, Stem cell collection
Abstract: EP1286
Type: E-Poster Presentation
Session title: Stem cell transplantation - Clinical
Background
The combination of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, Dara, to the main induction protocols (VRd, VTd, VCd) significantly improved the response rate of TE NDMM before transplantation. However, there is a concern regarding the possible interference in the SC collection and bone marrow engraftment, since SC, to some degree, express CD38 on their surface. In the MAX Dara study, Dara-CTd protocol was used sequentially close to the pre- and post-autologous stem cell transplantation-(ASCT) (D-30 and D + 30), in order to take advantage of the molecule's action as an in vivo purge.
Aims
In this analysis, we examine the impact of the number of Dara doses administered pre-mobilization on CD34 cell count, SC apheresis yield, and post-ASCT engraftment.
Methods
This is a phase II, open-label single-center clinical trial. The original protocol was Dara-CTd for up to four 28-day induction cycles and Dara-Td for up to four 28 days consolidation cycles. C-1500mg oral (PO) per cycle, during cycles 1 to 4, T at 100-200mg PO on days 1 to 28, during cycles 1-8, (d) at 160mg PO per cycle, during cycles 1 - 8 and Dara at 16mg/Kg/dose intravenous (IV) on days 1,8,15 and 22 during cycles 1 - 2 and every other week in cycles 3 – 8. Because of the COVID pandemic we had to adapted the protocol and moving 5-6 consolidation cycles to be used as induction, increasing the total dose of Dara from 12 to 16 and the number of cycles from 4 to 6 before ASCT. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered alone for SC mobilization and plerixafor added based on day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 counts. The target of SC collection was to enable the performance of one ASCT (>2,5 x 106/kg). PMN and platelet engraftment post-ASCT was defined as the first day with sustained PMN count >1000 x 106/L and independence from platelet transfusion in the preceding 7 days with a count >20 x 109/L, respectively
Results
From a total of 21 pts that were included, 19 pts completed mobilization. 12 pts received 12 and 7 pts received 16 induction Dara doses, respectively. The median number (range) of days between the last dose of Dara infusion and SC harvest was 23 (16-63) days. A total of five (26%) pts received plerixafor during mobilization. More pts from Dara 16 doses needed plerixafor comparing with Dara 12 doses (42% vs 16%), but without difference between the groups. Pts underwent a median (range) of 1 (1-2) days of apheresis. The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the total group was 3.94×106/kg, and no difference was found between Dara 12 vs 16 doses (3.61×106/kg vs 4.01x106/kg), p=0.27. There was no difference in the number of SC collected considering the response rate after induction > or < VGPR, and the last day of Dara use > or < 30 days, before SC harvesting. Hematopoietic reconstitution rates were similar for Dara 12 vs 16 doses, a median (range) of 11.0 (9-13) vs 11.0 (11-14) days was required to achieve sustained ANC > 1000 cells/mm3, and a median (range) of 12.0 (9-14) vs 11.0 (8-16) days was required to achieve sustained platelets > 20,000 cells/mm3 without transfusion, respectively.
Conclusion
SC mobilization was feasible with Dara-CTd induction. Despite the more doses of Dara use before mobilization increases the need of plerixafor use, the SC number difference was not significant comparing Dara 12 vs 16 doses (p = 0.3). The infusion of Dara close to harvest did not interfere with SC collection. Adding DARA to CTd allowed successful transplantation in pts with TE NDMM.
Keyword(s): Monoclonal antibody, Multiple myeloma, Phase II, Stem cell collection