EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

POMALIDOMIDE, DEXAMETHASONE, AND DARATUMUMAB IN RELAPSED REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (MM-014 PHASE 2 TRIAL): A SUBANALYSIS OF PATIENTS PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH LENALIDOMIDE AND A PROTEASOME INHIBITOR
Author(s): ,
Nizar J Bahlis
Affiliations:
Tom Baker Cancer Centre,Calgary,Canada
,
Gary J. Schiller
Affiliations:
David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles,Los Angeles,United States
,
Christy J. Samaras
Affiliations:
Cleveland Clinic,Cleveland,United States
,
Michael Sebag
Affiliations:
McGill University Health Centre,Montreal,Canada
,
Jesus G. Berdeja
Affiliations:
Sarah Cannon Research Institute,Nashville,United States
,
Siddhartha Ganguly
Affiliations:
The University of Kansas Cancer Center,Fairway,United States
,
Jeffrey Matous
Affiliations:
Colorado Blood Cancer Institute,Denver,United States
,
Kevin Song
Affiliations:
Vancouver General Hospital,Vancouver,Canada
,
Christopher Seet
Affiliations:
David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles,Los Angeles,United States
,
Mirelis Acosta-Rivera
Affiliations:
Fundación de Investigación,San Juan,Puerto Rico
,
Michael Bar
Affiliations:
Stamford Hospital,Stamford,United States
,
Donald Quick
Affiliations:
Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center,Lubbock,United States
,
Bertrand M. Anz
Affiliations:
Tennessee Oncology,Chattanooga,United States
,
Gustavo Fonseca
Affiliations:
Florida Cancer Specialists,St Petersburg,United States
,
Donna E. Reece
Affiliations:
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,Toronto,Canada
,
Prisca Vogel
Affiliations:
Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company,Boudry,Switzerland
,
Kim Lee
Affiliations:
Bristol Myers Squibb,Princeton,United States
,
Weiyuan Chung
Affiliations:
Bristol Myers Squibb,Princeton,United States
,
Amit Agarwal
Affiliations:
Bristol Myers Squibb,Princeton,United States
David S. Siegel
Affiliations:
John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center,Hackensack,United States
EHA Library. Bahlis N. 06/09/21; 324742; EP1019
Mr. Nizar J Bahlis
Mr. Nizar J Bahlis
Contributions
Abstract
Presentation during EHA2021: All e-poster presentations will be made available as of Friday, June 11, 2021 (09:00 CEST) and will be accessible for on-demand viewing until August 15, 2021 on the Virtual Congress platform.

Abstract: EP1019

Type: E-Poster Presentation

Session title: Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical

Background
Lenalidomide (LEN) with or without a proteasome inhibitor (PI) administered until disease progression is a standard treatment (Tx) approach for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). However, recent clinical trials investigating triplet therapies did not have a large representation of patients whose disease has relapsed or become refractory to LEN after early-line Tx. The phase 2 MM-014 trial (NCT01946477) was designed to investigate the outcomes with sequencing pomalidomide (POM)-based therapy immediately after first- or second-line LEN-based Tx failure in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM). In an earlier report of the intention-to-treat population (N = 112) from cohort B of this trial, POM + dexamethasone (DEX) + daratumumab (DARA) demonstrated promising efficacy and safety with an overall response rate (ORR) of 77.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 30.8 months (Siegel DS, et al. Blood 2020;136[suppl 1]: 16–17).

Aims
To report the efficacy and safety of POM + DEX + DARA immediately after LEN-based Tx failure in a subgroup of cohort B patients who received prior LEN + PI.

Methods
Patients with RRMM treated with 1-2 prior Tx lines, LEN-based Tx for ≥ 2 consecutive cycles as their most recent regimen, and progressive disease during or after their last line of Tx received POM + DEX + DARA. POM 4 mg/d was given orally on days 1-21; DEX 40 mg/d (20 mg/d in patients aged > 75 years) was given orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and DARA 16 mg/kg was given intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1 and 2, days 1 and 15 for cycles 3-6, and day 1 for cycles 7+. The primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS and safety.

Results
In cohort B, 89 of 112 patients (79%; median age, 65.0 years) had received prior LEN + PI. Among this patient subgroup, 67 patients (75.3%) had LEN-refractory MM and 22 (24.7%) had MM that relapsed after LEN Tx; most patients (52 [58.4%]) received 1 vs 2 (37 [41.6%]) prior Tx lines. Median duration of treatment of POM, DEX, and DARA was 15.9. 14.0, and 16.1 months, respectively. At data cutoff (March 24, 2020), the ORR was 78.7% (≥ very good partial response [VGPR], 55.1%); median follow-up of 28.3 months. The ORR was 80.8% (≥ VGPR, 63.5%) and 75.7% (≥ VGPR, 43.2%) in patients with 1 vs 2 prior lines of treatment, respectively. Median duration of response and median PFS were not yet reached (Figure; 1-year PFS rate, 74.1%). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 28.1% of patients and were primarily low grade. Overall, 97.8% of patients had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 Tx-emergent adverse event. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events were neutropenia (64.0%; febrile, 12.4%), anemia (19.1%), and thrombocytopenia (13.5%). Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 40.4% of patients, including 15.7% with grade 3/4 pneumonia.

Conclusion
In this subanalysis, POM + DEX + DARA administered immediately after LEN failure in a subgroup of patients previously treated with LEN + PI demonstrated a high response rate and a safety profile consistent with that in the overall cohort B population. The results support the use of POM-based therapy, integrating the monoclonal antibody DARA as early as second line in patients with RRMM, potentially immediately after LEN Tx failure. Furthermore, these data support subsequent Tx with the same immunomodulatory agent class in a patient population with LEN-relapsed or -refractory disease. 

 

Keyword(s): Clinical trial, Multiple myeloma, Refractory, Relapse

Presentation during EHA2021: All e-poster presentations will be made available as of Friday, June 11, 2021 (09:00 CEST) and will be accessible for on-demand viewing until August 15, 2021 on the Virtual Congress platform.

Abstract: EP1019

Type: E-Poster Presentation

Session title: Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical

Background
Lenalidomide (LEN) with or without a proteasome inhibitor (PI) administered until disease progression is a standard treatment (Tx) approach for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). However, recent clinical trials investigating triplet therapies did not have a large representation of patients whose disease has relapsed or become refractory to LEN after early-line Tx. The phase 2 MM-014 trial (NCT01946477) was designed to investigate the outcomes with sequencing pomalidomide (POM)-based therapy immediately after first- or second-line LEN-based Tx failure in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM). In an earlier report of the intention-to-treat population (N = 112) from cohort B of this trial, POM + dexamethasone (DEX) + daratumumab (DARA) demonstrated promising efficacy and safety with an overall response rate (ORR) of 77.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 30.8 months (Siegel DS, et al. Blood 2020;136[suppl 1]: 16–17).

Aims
To report the efficacy and safety of POM + DEX + DARA immediately after LEN-based Tx failure in a subgroup of cohort B patients who received prior LEN + PI.

Methods
Patients with RRMM treated with 1-2 prior Tx lines, LEN-based Tx for ≥ 2 consecutive cycles as their most recent regimen, and progressive disease during or after their last line of Tx received POM + DEX + DARA. POM 4 mg/d was given orally on days 1-21; DEX 40 mg/d (20 mg/d in patients aged > 75 years) was given orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and DARA 16 mg/kg was given intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1 and 2, days 1 and 15 for cycles 3-6, and day 1 for cycles 7+. The primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS and safety.

Results
In cohort B, 89 of 112 patients (79%; median age, 65.0 years) had received prior LEN + PI. Among this patient subgroup, 67 patients (75.3%) had LEN-refractory MM and 22 (24.7%) had MM that relapsed after LEN Tx; most patients (52 [58.4%]) received 1 vs 2 (37 [41.6%]) prior Tx lines. Median duration of treatment of POM, DEX, and DARA was 15.9. 14.0, and 16.1 months, respectively. At data cutoff (March 24, 2020), the ORR was 78.7% (≥ very good partial response [VGPR], 55.1%); median follow-up of 28.3 months. The ORR was 80.8% (≥ VGPR, 63.5%) and 75.7% (≥ VGPR, 43.2%) in patients with 1 vs 2 prior lines of treatment, respectively. Median duration of response and median PFS were not yet reached (Figure; 1-year PFS rate, 74.1%). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 28.1% of patients and were primarily low grade. Overall, 97.8% of patients had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 Tx-emergent adverse event. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic events were neutropenia (64.0%; febrile, 12.4%), anemia (19.1%), and thrombocytopenia (13.5%). Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 40.4% of patients, including 15.7% with grade 3/4 pneumonia.

Conclusion
In this subanalysis, POM + DEX + DARA administered immediately after LEN failure in a subgroup of patients previously treated with LEN + PI demonstrated a high response rate and a safety profile consistent with that in the overall cohort B population. The results support the use of POM-based therapy, integrating the monoclonal antibody DARA as early as second line in patients with RRMM, potentially immediately after LEN Tx failure. Furthermore, these data support subsequent Tx with the same immunomodulatory agent class in a patient population with LEN-relapsed or -refractory disease. 

 

Keyword(s): Clinical trial, Multiple myeloma, Refractory, Relapse

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies