EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

CIRCULATING TUMOR CELLS (CTC) ARE THE MOST RELEVANT DIAGNOSTIC BIOMARKER IN TRANSPLANT-ELIGIBLE MULTIPLE MYELOMA (MM)
Author(s): ,
Juan-José Garcés
Affiliations:
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA),Pamplona,Spain
,
Maria-Teresa Cedena
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre,Madrid,Spain
,
Noemi Puig
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC),Salamanca,Spain
,
Leire Burgos
Affiliations:
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA),Pamplona,Spain
,
Jose J Perez
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC),Salamanca,Spain
,
Lourdes Cordon
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe,Valencia,Spain
,
Juan Flores-Montero
Affiliations:
Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSIC/USAL-IBSAL), Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (USAL),Salamanca,Spain
,
Luzalba Sanoja-Flores
Affiliations:
Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSIC/USAL-IBSAL), Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (USAL),Salamanca,Spain
,
Albert Oriol
Affiliations:
Institut Català d’Oncologia i Institut Josep Carreras,Barcelona,Spain
,
María-Jesús Blanchard
Affiliations:
Hospital Ramón y Cajal,Madrid,Spain
,
Rafael Rios
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
Jesus Martin
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla,Sevilla,Spain
,
Rafael Martinez-Martinez
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario San Carlos,Madrid,Spain
,
Joan Bargay
Affiliations:
Hospital Son Llatzer,Palma de Mallorca,Spain
,
Anna Sureda
Affiliations:
Institut Català d'Oncologia L’Hospitalet,Barcelona,Spain
,
Javier De La Rubia
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe,Valencia,Spain
,
Miguel-Teodoro Hernandez
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario de Canarias,Santa Cruz de Tenerife,Spain
,
Paula Rodriguez-Otero
Affiliations:
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA),Pamplona,Spain
,
Alberto Orfao
Affiliations:
Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSIC/USAL-IBSAL), Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (USAL),Salamanca,Spain
,
Maria-Victoria Mateos
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC),Salamanca,Spain
,
Joaquin Martinez-Lopez
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre,Madrid,Spain
,
Laura Rosiñol
Affiliations:
Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS,Barcelona,Spain
,
Joan Blade
Affiliations:
Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS,Barcelona,Spain
,
Jesus F. San-Miguel
Affiliations:
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA),Pamplona,Spain
Bruno Paiva
Affiliations:
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA),Pamplona,Spain
EHA Library. Garcés J. 06/09/21; 324593; S185
Juan-José Garcés
Juan-José Garcés
Contributions
Abstract
Presentation during EHA2021: All Oral presentations will be made available as of Friday, June 11, 2021 (09:00 CEST) and will be accessible for on-demand viewing until August 15, 2021 on the Virtual Congress platform.

Abstract: S185

Type: Oral Presentation

Session title: New diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis

Background

There is great expectation in liquid biopsies to stratify patients with cancer. These could be particularly valuable in MM where despite patchy infiltration and likelihood of extramedullary disease, quantification of tumor burden continues being performed in bone marrow (BM). However, there are no large studies analyzing if liquid biopsies using next-generation methods yield superior prognostic information than conventional cytology in BM.

Aims
To establish the clinical significance of CTC burden in peripheral blood (PB) and to define cutoffs for risk stratification of newly-diagnosed MM patients.

Methods
This study included 375 transplant-eligible patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial and treated with six induction cycles of VRD followed by autologous transplant and consolidation with two VRD courses. Afterwards, patients received Rd (with or without ixazomib) for two years and either stopped maintenance if MRD negative or continued three more years if MRD positive (GEM2014MAIN). EuroFlow next-generation flow was used to evaluate CTCs in PB at diagnosis and MRD in BM throughout treatment. Cutoffs were defined using maximally selected rank statistics considering PFS. Median follow-up is of 5 years.

Results
CTC were detected in 345/375 (92%) of patients. There was a modest correlation between the percentage of CTCs in PB and tumor burden in BM by morphology (R2=0.35, p<0.0001) and flow cytometry (R2=0.41, p<0.0001). These data suggests that CTC egression is not directly related with tumor burden in BM.

Patients stratification into 4 subgroups according to the percentage of CTC (Group 0: 0%, Group 1: >0% to <0.24%, Group 2: ≥0.24% to <2.88%, and Group 3: ≥2.88%) resulted in significant differences in PFS (median not reached [NR] vs 78, 47 and 23 months, and hazard ratios of 4.9, 8.8 and 15.8, respectively; p<0.0001) and overall survival ([OS] 100%, 81%, 69% and 50% at 5 years, p=0.0002). In a multivariable analysis including quantification of tumor burden in PB using NGF and in BM by morphology and flow cytometry, the percentage of CTC was selected as the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (p=0.001). In a subsequent multivariable analysis including the percentage of CTC in PB, ISS, LDH and FISH cytogenetics, quantification of CTC was selected as the most relevant prognostic factor for PFS. Indeed, risk stratification according to the CTC cutoffs previously defined was prognostic in all risk groups including patients with standard-risk FISH (median PFS NR in Groups 0 & 1 vs 44 and 30 months in Groups 2 & 3, respectively: p=0.005).


We further investigated if deep responses to treatment were able to abrogate the poor prognosis of elevated CTC at diagnosis. Patients in Groups 2 & 3 showed significantly inferior PFS (median of 59 and 48 months) than cases in Groups 0 & 1 (median NR; p=0.004) despite achieving CR. By contrast, there were no significant differences in PFS of MRD negative patients stratified according to the percentage of CTC (p=0.017). Patients with 0% CTC and negative MRD before maintenance showed outstanding PFS and OS rates of 94% and 100% at 5 years.

Conclusion
Evaluation of CTC in PB outperformed quantification of tumor burden in BM and was the most relevant prognostic factor at baseline. Attaining undetectable MRD as opposed to CR should be considered as the treatment endpoint in patients with elevated percentages of CTC in PB. Patients with undetectable CTC at diagnosis and undetectable MRD after treatment intensification showed long-term survival with fixed duration maintenance therapy.

Keyword(s): Bone marrow biopsy, Minimal residual disease (MRD), Peripheral blood, Survival prediction

Presentation during EHA2021: All Oral presentations will be made available as of Friday, June 11, 2021 (09:00 CEST) and will be accessible for on-demand viewing until August 15, 2021 on the Virtual Congress platform.

Abstract: S185

Type: Oral Presentation

Session title: New diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis

Background

There is great expectation in liquid biopsies to stratify patients with cancer. These could be particularly valuable in MM where despite patchy infiltration and likelihood of extramedullary disease, quantification of tumor burden continues being performed in bone marrow (BM). However, there are no large studies analyzing if liquid biopsies using next-generation methods yield superior prognostic information than conventional cytology in BM.

Aims
To establish the clinical significance of CTC burden in peripheral blood (PB) and to define cutoffs for risk stratification of newly-diagnosed MM patients.

Methods
This study included 375 transplant-eligible patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial and treated with six induction cycles of VRD followed by autologous transplant and consolidation with two VRD courses. Afterwards, patients received Rd (with or without ixazomib) for two years and either stopped maintenance if MRD negative or continued three more years if MRD positive (GEM2014MAIN). EuroFlow next-generation flow was used to evaluate CTCs in PB at diagnosis and MRD in BM throughout treatment. Cutoffs were defined using maximally selected rank statistics considering PFS. Median follow-up is of 5 years.

Results
CTC were detected in 345/375 (92%) of patients. There was a modest correlation between the percentage of CTCs in PB and tumor burden in BM by morphology (R2=0.35, p<0.0001) and flow cytometry (R2=0.41, p<0.0001). These data suggests that CTC egression is not directly related with tumor burden in BM.

Patients stratification into 4 subgroups according to the percentage of CTC (Group 0: 0%, Group 1: >0% to <0.24%, Group 2: ≥0.24% to <2.88%, and Group 3: ≥2.88%) resulted in significant differences in PFS (median not reached [NR] vs 78, 47 and 23 months, and hazard ratios of 4.9, 8.8 and 15.8, respectively; p<0.0001) and overall survival ([OS] 100%, 81%, 69% and 50% at 5 years, p=0.0002). In a multivariable analysis including quantification of tumor burden in PB using NGF and in BM by morphology and flow cytometry, the percentage of CTC was selected as the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (p=0.001). In a subsequent multivariable analysis including the percentage of CTC in PB, ISS, LDH and FISH cytogenetics, quantification of CTC was selected as the most relevant prognostic factor for PFS. Indeed, risk stratification according to the CTC cutoffs previously defined was prognostic in all risk groups including patients with standard-risk FISH (median PFS NR in Groups 0 & 1 vs 44 and 30 months in Groups 2 & 3, respectively: p=0.005).


We further investigated if deep responses to treatment were able to abrogate the poor prognosis of elevated CTC at diagnosis. Patients in Groups 2 & 3 showed significantly inferior PFS (median of 59 and 48 months) than cases in Groups 0 & 1 (median NR; p=0.004) despite achieving CR. By contrast, there were no significant differences in PFS of MRD negative patients stratified according to the percentage of CTC (p=0.017). Patients with 0% CTC and negative MRD before maintenance showed outstanding PFS and OS rates of 94% and 100% at 5 years.

Conclusion
Evaluation of CTC in PB outperformed quantification of tumor burden in BM and was the most relevant prognostic factor at baseline. Attaining undetectable MRD as opposed to CR should be considered as the treatment endpoint in patients with elevated percentages of CTC in PB. Patients with undetectable CTC at diagnosis and undetectable MRD after treatment intensification showed long-term survival with fixed duration maintenance therapy.

Keyword(s): Bone marrow biopsy, Minimal residual disease (MRD), Peripheral blood, Survival prediction

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies