EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

Abstract: S167

Type: Oral Presentation

Session title: Novel targets in MDS

Background
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutations occur in 5% of patients (pts) with MDS. Enasidenib (ENA) is a selective oral inhibitor of the mutant IDH2 enzyme with single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Aims
An open label phase II study designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ENA, as monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine (AZA) in pts with higher-risk IDH2-mutated MDS. (NCT03383575)

Methods
Pts with higher-risk [Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk > 3 or high molecular risk (HMR)] MDS/CMML or LB AML naïve to hypomethylating agents (HMA) received ENA100 mg orally daily for 28 d of each 28-d cycle + AZA 75 mg/m2 IV or SC on d 1-7 of each cycle (ENA+AZA), and  pts with refractory or progressive MDS to prior HMA therapy received ENA alone (ENA), in 28-d cycles until unacceptable toxicity, relapse, transformation to AML, or progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) [complete remission (CR), marrow CR (mCR), partial remission (PR) and hematologic improvement (HI)]. Other endpoints include safety, and survival outcomes.

Results
48 pts received ENA+AZA (n = 26) or ENA (n = 22). The median age was 73 yrs (range, 46-83). Most pts (72%) had HMR: ASXL1 (39%), and RUNX1 (17%). Median number Tx cycles was 4 (2–32) in the ENA+AZA, and 7 (1–23) in the ENA arm. Common Tx-related grade 3–4 AEs in the ENA+AZA arm were neutropenia (64%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and anemia (8%); these occurred in 10%, 0%, and 5%, in the ENA arm. Grade 3–4 infections occurred in 32% (ENA+AZA) and 14% (ENA). IDH differentiation syndrome occurred in 3 pts (12%) in the ENA+AZA and 5 pts (24%) in the ENA arm. Two deaths occurred during the initial 60 d, both unrelated to study and due to COVID. In response-evaluable pts (n=46), ORR was 84% (n = 21/25; 24% CR + 8% PR+44% mCR+ 8% HI] in the treatment naïve ENA+AZA and 43% (n = 9/21; 24% CR+5%PR+5% mCR+10% HI) in the HMA failure ENA arm (Table). Most common reason for Tx discontinuation was disease progression (ENA+AZA 20%, ENA 33%).5 pts (20%) received HCT in the ENA+AZA and 1 (5%) in the ENA arm. 7 pts in the ENA+AZA and 5 in the ENA arm were ongoing at data cutoff (Dec 31, 2020). After a median follow up of 12.6 mo, median OS was 32.2 mo in the ENA+AZA and 21.3 mo in the ENA arm.

Conclusion
ENA is well tolerated and shows promising efficacy in IDH2-mutated higher risk MDS. Follow up and accrual is ongoing to better define duration and biomarkers of response.

Keyword(s): AG-221, Azacitidine, MDS, Targeted therapy