EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT CONDITIONING REGIMENS WHEN PERFORMING AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS
Author(s): ,
Ivan Kostroma
Affiliations:
Bone marrow transplantation,Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology,S.Petersburg,Russian Federation
,
Anastasija Zhernjakova
Affiliations:
Bone marrow transplantation,Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology,S.Petersburg,Russian Federation
,
Ruzilja Sabitova
Affiliations:
Bone marrow transplantation,Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology,S.Petersburg,Russian Federation
,
Zhana Sidorova
Affiliations:
Bone marrow transplantation,Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology,S.Petersburg,Russian Federation
,
Stanislav Bessmel'tsev
Affiliations:
Bone marrow transplantation,Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology,S.Petersburg,Russian Federation
Sergey Gritsaev
Affiliations:
Bone marrow transplantation,Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology,S.Petersburg,Russian Federation
EHA Library. Kostroma I. 06/09/21; 324454; PB1783
Ivan Kostroma
Ivan Kostroma
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB1783

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Stem cell transplantation - Clinical

Background
The principal role of autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is dependent primarilly on cytoreductive action of conditioning regimen (CR). There are different approaches to strengthen antimyeloma exposure of CR and one of them is adding a new drug to standard used melphalan 

Aims
The aim was to compare the effectiveness of standard used CR with melphalan (Mel) monotherapy with combination of Mel with thiotepa (Mel/Thio) and combination of Mel with carfilzomib (Mel/Carfil). Progression free survavl (PFS) was chosen as a measure of CR effectiveness

Methods
Response to therapy before AutoSCT was identified with IWG criteria. PFS was calculared from the data of AutoSCT in patients without MM progression during the first 3 months. Thre groups of patients were formed: the first group of 27 patients with CR Mel200/140, the second group of 9 patients with CR Mel/Thio and the third one of 8 patients with CR Mel/Carfil

Results
Median age of patients in the group one, two and three was 54y, 59y and 57.5 y accordingly. The number of patients with comple, very good partial and partial response was 10, 7 and 10 in the first group, 1, 4 and 1 in the second group and 1, 1 and 6 in the third group. The patients' follow-up period was 14 (3-40), 13 (10-26) and 11.5 (3-18) months in the groups accordingly. The median PFS was 40 mo, 13 mo and not achived in the groups accordingly: p=0.833. Difference in the data of PFS between indidvidual groups has not been found too

Conclusion
Despite the lack of distinction, the trend towards improved PFS in the group with the pre-eminent number of MM patients with partial response treated with regimen Mel/Carfil possibly reflects a more pronounced antimyeloma effect of this CR. A longer period of observation is needed for the final conclusion

Keyword(s):

Abstract: PB1783

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Stem cell transplantation - Clinical

Background
The principal role of autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is dependent primarilly on cytoreductive action of conditioning regimen (CR). There are different approaches to strengthen antimyeloma exposure of CR and one of them is adding a new drug to standard used melphalan 

Aims
The aim was to compare the effectiveness of standard used CR with melphalan (Mel) monotherapy with combination of Mel with thiotepa (Mel/Thio) and combination of Mel with carfilzomib (Mel/Carfil). Progression free survavl (PFS) was chosen as a measure of CR effectiveness

Methods
Response to therapy before AutoSCT was identified with IWG criteria. PFS was calculared from the data of AutoSCT in patients without MM progression during the first 3 months. Thre groups of patients were formed: the first group of 27 patients with CR Mel200/140, the second group of 9 patients with CR Mel/Thio and the third one of 8 patients with CR Mel/Carfil

Results
Median age of patients in the group one, two and three was 54y, 59y and 57.5 y accordingly. The number of patients with comple, very good partial and partial response was 10, 7 and 10 in the first group, 1, 4 and 1 in the second group and 1, 1 and 6 in the third group. The patients' follow-up period was 14 (3-40), 13 (10-26) and 11.5 (3-18) months in the groups accordingly. The median PFS was 40 mo, 13 mo and not achived in the groups accordingly: p=0.833. Difference in the data of PFS between indidvidual groups has not been found too

Conclusion
Despite the lack of distinction, the trend towards improved PFS in the group with the pre-eminent number of MM patients with partial response treated with regimen Mel/Carfil possibly reflects a more pronounced antimyeloma effect of this CR. A longer period of observation is needed for the final conclusion

Keyword(s):

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies