EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

PATIENT-CENTERED FACTORS IN EVALUATION OF ELIGIBILITY AND PROGNOSTICATION IN HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Author(s): ,
Stefan Koeck
Affiliations:
Internal Medicine V, Hematology/Oncology,Medical University of Innsbruck,Innsbruck,Austria
,
Florian Prader
Affiliations:
Internal Medicine V, Hematology/Oncology,Medical University of Innsbruck,Innsbruck,Austria
,
Igor Stojkov
Affiliations:
Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment,UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology,Hall in Tirol,Austria
,
Karin Koinig
Affiliations:
Internal Medicine V, Hematology/Oncology,Medical University of Innsbruck,Innsbruck,Austria
Reinhard Stauder
Affiliations:
Internal Medicine V, Hematology/Oncology,Medical University of Innsbruck,Innsbruck,Austria
EHA Library. Koeck S. 06/09/21; 324448; PB1777
Stefan Koeck
Stefan Koeck
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB1777

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Stem cell transplantation - Clinical

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a cornerstone in individualized treatment algorithms in blood cancer. However, assessment of eligibility and outcome prediction remains challenging, particularly at advanced age.

Aims
This systematic review investigates the relevance of patient-orientated scores in decision-making in HSCT.

Methods
We performed a systematic review with a literature search on MEDLINE and Web of Science on the use and prognostic relevance of patient-centered scores in allogeneic and autologous HSCT in adult patients with hematologic malignancies.

Results
After screening 2326 studies, we identified 59 studies using at least one validated score to determine eligibility for HSCT, including 57 studies assessing  performance status (PS) and three studies using comorbidity scores. Prognostic relevance of comorbidities was analysed in 128 studies, of PS in 67, of functional activities in three, of nutritional status in ten and of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in six studies. Based on uni-/multivariate analyses,  predictors  of overall survival in allogeneic HSCT included comorbidities in 42/72 (58%) and in 39/58 (67%),  PS in 20/33 (61%) and 30/37 (81%), nutritional status in 1/3 and 3/5, functional activities in 2/3 and 2/2 and HRQOL  in 2/3 and 2/2, respectively. Likewise, comorbidities were predictors of reduced survival in autologous HSCT in 3/9 (33%) and 4/7 (57%) and PS in 4/5 (80%) and 4/6 (67%), respectively.

Conclusion
To date, validated patient-centered scores have been rarely used to evaluate eligibility for HSCT. The prognostic impact of comorbidities and of PS was demonstrated in a relevant proportion of studies and the results for the relevance of functional activities and HRQOL are encouraging. Thus, the relevance and further integration of patient-orientated scoring in decision-making in HSCT is underlined.

Keyword(s): Bone marrow transplant, Comorbidities, Elderly, Prognosis

Abstract: PB1777

Type: Publication Only

Session title: Stem cell transplantation - Clinical

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a cornerstone in individualized treatment algorithms in blood cancer. However, assessment of eligibility and outcome prediction remains challenging, particularly at advanced age.

Aims
This systematic review investigates the relevance of patient-orientated scores in decision-making in HSCT.

Methods
We performed a systematic review with a literature search on MEDLINE and Web of Science on the use and prognostic relevance of patient-centered scores in allogeneic and autologous HSCT in adult patients with hematologic malignancies.

Results
After screening 2326 studies, we identified 59 studies using at least one validated score to determine eligibility for HSCT, including 57 studies assessing  performance status (PS) and three studies using comorbidity scores. Prognostic relevance of comorbidities was analysed in 128 studies, of PS in 67, of functional activities in three, of nutritional status in ten and of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in six studies. Based on uni-/multivariate analyses,  predictors  of overall survival in allogeneic HSCT included comorbidities in 42/72 (58%) and in 39/58 (67%),  PS in 20/33 (61%) and 30/37 (81%), nutritional status in 1/3 and 3/5, functional activities in 2/3 and 2/2 and HRQOL  in 2/3 and 2/2, respectively. Likewise, comorbidities were predictors of reduced survival in autologous HSCT in 3/9 (33%) and 4/7 (57%) and PS in 4/5 (80%) and 4/6 (67%), respectively.

Conclusion
To date, validated patient-centered scores have been rarely used to evaluate eligibility for HSCT. The prognostic impact of comorbidities and of PS was demonstrated in a relevant proportion of studies and the results for the relevance of functional activities and HRQOL are encouraging. Thus, the relevance and further integration of patient-orientated scoring in decision-making in HSCT is underlined.

Keyword(s): Bone marrow transplant, Comorbidities, Elderly, Prognosis

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies