EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

COMPARING EFFICACY OF INITIAL INDUCTION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA. A VALUABLE INFORMATION IN POPULATION-BASED REGISTRIES
Author(s): ,
Rafael Ríos-Tamayo
Affiliations:
Monoclonal Gammopathies Unit,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
María José Sánchez Pérez
Affiliations:
Granada Cancer Registry,Andalusian School of Public Health,Granada,Spain
,
Dolores Sánchez-Rodríguez
Affiliations:
Monoclonal Gammopathies Unit,FIBAO,Granada,Spain
,
Agustín Martín García
Affiliations:
Clinical Trials Unit,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
Yoe-Ling Chang-Chan
Affiliations:
Granada Cancer Registry,Andalusian School of Public Health,Granada,Spain
,
Sergio Sequera
Affiliations:
Pharmacy,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
José Luís García de Veas Silva
Affiliations:
Immunology,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
Juan Sainz Pérez
Affiliations:
Hematology,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
Ana Beatriz Rivera Ginés
Affiliations:
Monoclonal Gammopathies Unit,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
María Esther Clavero Sánchez
Affiliations:
Monoclonal Gammopathies Unit,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
,
Carolina Alarcón Payer
Affiliations:
Pharmacy,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
Manuel Jurado Chacón
Affiliations:
Hematology,University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves,Granada,Spain
(Abstract release date: 05/17/18) EHA Library. Rios-Tamayo R. 06/14/18; 216499; PB2201
Dr. Rafael Rios-Tamayo
Dr. Rafael Rios-Tamayo
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB2201

Type: Publication Only

Background

Prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM) depends on specific patient and disease characteristics, staging and response. Strong evidence supports the quality and duration of the response, in accordance with IMWG criteria, as a key prognostic factor. Therefore, a careful monthly monitoring of response is mandatory, as well as a global evaluation after each phase of the treatment. Outside clinical trials (ct), heterogeneity remains in relation to response evaluation of real-life patients. Even in the setting of population-based MM registries, the response is rarely reported.

Aims

Assessing the evolution of the response to old and current induction regimens.

Methods
The Granada MM Registry is the second largest single-institution population-based registry (Ríos-Tamayo R et al.2015), working since 1985. Evaluation of the response was prospectively recorded since 2012, and retrospectively during the previous period. IMWG criteria have been used, including imaging (PET/CT) and flow minimal residual disease (MRD)(Kumar S et al.2016). All consecutive newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with residence in our reference area, which were considered fit to receive the standard induction regimen at the moment of diagnosis, were included. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate have been pointed out. When information was not available, the response was informed as unknown/not valuable.

Results

359 NDMM patients have been evaluated in relation to 12 regimens, including two or more drugs: melphalan-prednisone (MP), vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone (VAD), V-BCNU-M-cyclophosphamide-P/V-BCNU-A-D (VBMCP/VBAD), bortezomib-D (VD), VMP, VCD, V-lenalidomide-D (VRD), V-thalidomide-D (VTD), bortezomib-A-D (PAD), RD, R-D-clarithromycin (RDC), carfilzomib-R-D (KRD). Table 1 shows the number (n) of patients in each combination, ORR and CR rates. If the regimen has been used in the context of a ct, it has been indicated.

REGIMEN

n

ORR

%

CR

%

MRD

NEG%

UN

KNOWN

CLINICAL

TRIAL

MP

25

20

4

-

44

N

VAD

74

50.1

4.1

-

33.8

N

VCMPVBAD

6

66.6

33.3

-

16.7

N

VD

58

58.6

19

3.5

22.4

N

VMP

53

52.9

18.9

-

35.8

N

VCD

97

79.3

24.7

2.1

8.3

N

VRD

20

95

70

35

5

Y(18)

VTD

3

100

33.3

-

0

N

PAD

4

75

25

-

25

N

RD

9

66.7

55.6

22.2

22.2

Y(3)

RDC

4

100

25

25

0

Y

KRD

6

100

66.7

33.3

0

Y

Conclusion
The information about response should be prospectively recorded in MM population-based registries. The retrospective evaluation of response in old regimens is inconclusive due to a high proportion of unknown response. The new triplets, particularly VRD and KRD, whose approval in real-life is still pending, are highly effective as induction. Triplets are more effective than doublets. However, selected patients treated with doublets can achieve CR with MRD negativity. The heterogeneity in response highlights the need to implement a risk-adapted, individualized, and patient-centered therapy. 

Session topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical

Keyword(s): Induction, Multiple Myeloma

Abstract: PB2201

Type: Publication Only

Background

Prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM) depends on specific patient and disease characteristics, staging and response. Strong evidence supports the quality and duration of the response, in accordance with IMWG criteria, as a key prognostic factor. Therefore, a careful monthly monitoring of response is mandatory, as well as a global evaluation after each phase of the treatment. Outside clinical trials (ct), heterogeneity remains in relation to response evaluation of real-life patients. Even in the setting of population-based MM registries, the response is rarely reported.

Aims

Assessing the evolution of the response to old and current induction regimens.

Methods
The Granada MM Registry is the second largest single-institution population-based registry (Ríos-Tamayo R et al.2015), working since 1985. Evaluation of the response was prospectively recorded since 2012, and retrospectively during the previous period. IMWG criteria have been used, including imaging (PET/CT) and flow minimal residual disease (MRD)(Kumar S et al.2016). All consecutive newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with residence in our reference area, which were considered fit to receive the standard induction regimen at the moment of diagnosis, were included. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate have been pointed out. When information was not available, the response was informed as unknown/not valuable.

Results

359 NDMM patients have been evaluated in relation to 12 regimens, including two or more drugs: melphalan-prednisone (MP), vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone (VAD), V-BCNU-M-cyclophosphamide-P/V-BCNU-A-D (VBMCP/VBAD), bortezomib-D (VD), VMP, VCD, V-lenalidomide-D (VRD), V-thalidomide-D (VTD), bortezomib-A-D (PAD), RD, R-D-clarithromycin (RDC), carfilzomib-R-D (KRD). Table 1 shows the number (n) of patients in each combination, ORR and CR rates. If the regimen has been used in the context of a ct, it has been indicated.

REGIMEN

n

ORR

%

CR

%

MRD

NEG%

UN

KNOWN

CLINICAL

TRIAL

MP

25

20

4

-

44

N

VAD

74

50.1

4.1

-

33.8

N

VCMPVBAD

6

66.6

33.3

-

16.7

N

VD

58

58.6

19

3.5

22.4

N

VMP

53

52.9

18.9

-

35.8

N

VCD

97

79.3

24.7

2.1

8.3

N

VRD

20

95

70

35

5

Y(18)

VTD

3

100

33.3

-

0

N

PAD

4

75

25

-

25

N

RD

9

66.7

55.6

22.2

22.2

Y(3)

RDC

4

100

25

25

0

Y

KRD

6

100

66.7

33.3

0

Y

Conclusion
The information about response should be prospectively recorded in MM population-based registries. The retrospective evaluation of response in old regimens is inconclusive due to a high proportion of unknown response. The new triplets, particularly VRD and KRD, whose approval in real-life is still pending, are highly effective as induction. Triplets are more effective than doublets. However, selected patients treated with doublets can achieve CR with MRD negativity. The heterogeneity in response highlights the need to implement a risk-adapted, individualized, and patient-centered therapy. 

Session topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical

Keyword(s): Induction, Multiple Myeloma

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies