EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

PERFORMANCE OF THE ΑLPHA-GLOBIN STRIPASSAY® AND MLPA® FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF ΑLPHA-THALASSAEMIA
Author(s): ,
Julie Oosterbos
Affiliations:
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium
,
Helena Claerhout
Affiliations:
Department of Laboratory Medicine,University Hospitals Leuven,Leuven,Belgium
,
Cornelis L. Harteveld
Affiliations:
Department of Clinical Genetics,Leiden University Medical Center,Leiden,Belgium
,
Els Lierman
Affiliations:
Center for Human genetics,University Hospitals Leuven,Leuven,Belgium
Davy Kieffer
Affiliations:
Department of Laboratory Medicine,University Hospitals Leuven,Leuven,Belgium;Department of Microbiology and Immunology,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Claerhout H. 05/18/17; 182911; PB2198
Helena Claerhout
Helena Claerhout
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB2198

Type: Publication Only

Background

Diagnosing α-thalassaemia requires second line diagnostics involving DNA analysis. Multiplex ligation probe amplification® (MLPA®) is a molecular technique introduced as a diagnostic tool for α-thalassaemia. This semi-quantitative technique determines the relative copy number of up to 60 DNA sequences and is able to detect deletions and duplications in a DNA sample. A novel commercial tool, the α-Globin StripAssay®, aims to detect the most common α-thalassaemia deletions and point mutations. The test involves three steps: DNA isolation, PCR reaction and a hybridization step to test strip containing allele-specific oligonucleotide probes immobilised as an array of parallel lines.

Aims

Our objective was to evaluate the α-Globin StripAssay® as a useful alternative for MLPA® in second line α-thalassaemia diagnostics.

Methods

Eight samples, including 7 known deletions (_ _SEA, _ _THAI, _ _MED, homozygous and heterozygous - α3.7, heterozygous - α4.2, (α)20.5) and 1 mutation (Hb Constant Spring) were analysed using multiplex Gap-PCR (deletions) and Sanger sequencing (point mutation) at the Leiden University Medical Center. These samples were anonymised and analysed in duplicate by MLPA® and α-Globin StripAssay® at our center. A comparison of diagnostic performance, interpretation, turnaround time (TAT) and costs (reagent and labour) was done.

Results

There are no significant differences between the MLPA® and the α-Globin StripAssay® results and each identification corresponded to the result of the reference lab in Leiden. MLPA® however provided additional information about underlying polymorphisms. Interpretation of the α-Globin StripAssay® was easier and faster compared to MLPA®. The α-Globin StripAssay® proved to have a shorter TAT, but on the other hand, the costs for MLPA® were significantly less.

Conclusion

Despite its straightforward interpretation, shorter TAT and the ability of detecting both (known) deletions and point mutations, the significantly higher costs of the α-Globin StripAssay® may hinder it’s routine use. Specialised laboratories are usually acquainted with the MLPA technique and in these settings the ability to detect both known and unknown deletions is a plus for research purposes.

Session topic: 26. Thalassemias

Keyword(s): Thalassemia

Abstract: PB2198

Type: Publication Only

Background

Diagnosing α-thalassaemia requires second line diagnostics involving DNA analysis. Multiplex ligation probe amplification® (MLPA®) is a molecular technique introduced as a diagnostic tool for α-thalassaemia. This semi-quantitative technique determines the relative copy number of up to 60 DNA sequences and is able to detect deletions and duplications in a DNA sample. A novel commercial tool, the α-Globin StripAssay®, aims to detect the most common α-thalassaemia deletions and point mutations. The test involves three steps: DNA isolation, PCR reaction and a hybridization step to test strip containing allele-specific oligonucleotide probes immobilised as an array of parallel lines.

Aims

Our objective was to evaluate the α-Globin StripAssay® as a useful alternative for MLPA® in second line α-thalassaemia diagnostics.

Methods

Eight samples, including 7 known deletions (_ _SEA, _ _THAI, _ _MED, homozygous and heterozygous - α3.7, heterozygous - α4.2, (α)20.5) and 1 mutation (Hb Constant Spring) were analysed using multiplex Gap-PCR (deletions) and Sanger sequencing (point mutation) at the Leiden University Medical Center. These samples were anonymised and analysed in duplicate by MLPA® and α-Globin StripAssay® at our center. A comparison of diagnostic performance, interpretation, turnaround time (TAT) and costs (reagent and labour) was done.

Results

There are no significant differences between the MLPA® and the α-Globin StripAssay® results and each identification corresponded to the result of the reference lab in Leiden. MLPA® however provided additional information about underlying polymorphisms. Interpretation of the α-Globin StripAssay® was easier and faster compared to MLPA®. The α-Globin StripAssay® proved to have a shorter TAT, but on the other hand, the costs for MLPA® were significantly less.

Conclusion

Despite its straightforward interpretation, shorter TAT and the ability of detecting both (known) deletions and point mutations, the significantly higher costs of the α-Globin StripAssay® may hinder it’s routine use. Specialised laboratories are usually acquainted with the MLPA technique and in these settings the ability to detect both known and unknown deletions is a plus for research purposes.

Session topic: 26. Thalassemias

Keyword(s): Thalassemia

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies