EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

THROMBOPOIETIN-RECEPTOR AGONISTS IN ITP - EXPERIENCE OF A CENTER
Author(s): ,
Maria Jose Teles
Affiliations:
Clinical Pathology,Sao Joao Hospital Centre,Porto,Portugal
,
Marta Gomes
Affiliations:
Clinical Hemathology,Sao Joao Hospital Centre,Porto,Portugal
,
Fatima Ferreira
Affiliations:
Clinical Hemathology,Sao Joao Hospital Centre,Porto,Portugal
Jose Eduardo Guimaraes
Affiliations:
Clinical Hemathology,Sao Joao Hospital Centre,Porto,Portugal
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Teles M. 05/18/17; 182832; PB2118
Dra Maria Jose Teles
Dra Maria Jose Teles
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB2118

Type: Publication Only

Background
Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TRA), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are part of the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), resistant to first line therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunoglobulins) and with a significant bleeding risk. Both are approved for adult patients, but only eltrombopag was approved for pediatric use. When used before splenectomy, these treatments may serve as a bridge for surgery or even postpone/avoid the procedure.

Aims
In this report, we aim to evaluate the response to TRA treatment in patients with ITP and associated side effects in our center.

Methods
Inclusion criteria: patients with ITP resistant to first line treatment. Patients characteristics, response to TRA, clinical evolution and adverse effects were evaluated by retrospective analysis.

Results
Thirty-eight patients with ITP were included: 31.4% (12) were male and the median age at diagnosis was 38 years. 44.7% (17) had relapsed/resistant disease after splenectomy and 13.2% (5) were treated with a TRA as a bridge for this procedure. Sixteen (42.1%) of ITP patients were treated with romiplostim: 12 patients (75%) had a response to treatment, and 4 (25%) were resistant. In 11 of these patients, romiplostim was replaced by eltrombopag, either because of resistant disease, or more convenient administration (oral therapy). Thirty-three (86.8%) patients were treated with eltrombopag (5 pediatric cases): 27 patients (81.8%) responded while 6 patients had resistant disease (3 of these were HIV positive). The response rate was higher in patients with previous splenectomy (91.7% with romiplostim and 92.9% with eltrombopag) compared to those with no previous splenectomy (25% with romiplostim and 73.7% with eltrombopag). Six patients maintained response after treatment suspension (5 treated with eltrombopag and 1 treated with romiplostim). Generally, both treatments were well tolerated, with only one case of eltrombopag suspension because of a thromboembolic event.

Conclusion
In the current study, both TRA were effective in the treatment of ITP resistant to several lines of treatment, with similar response rates. As described in the literature, the response rate was higher in patients with previous splenectomy, and some cases maintained response after treatment suspension.

The toxicity profile was acceptable. However, there are some concerns about their safety in long term therapy, namely the development of myelofibrosis, cytogenetic abnormalities and malignant evolution. Consequently, there is an urgent need for prospective studies to define the optimal period of treatment and surveillance, especially in pediatric patients.
In our center, the median time of treatment with eltrombopag for all patients was 5.5 months (range between 1 to 34 months) and with romiplostim was 12 months (range between 1.5 to 85 months). The duration of treatment with eltrombopag in children and adolescents was around 6 months.

Session topic: 32. Platelets disorders

Keyword(s): Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Abstract: PB2118

Type: Publication Only

Background
Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TRA), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are part of the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), resistant to first line therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunoglobulins) and with a significant bleeding risk. Both are approved for adult patients, but only eltrombopag was approved for pediatric use. When used before splenectomy, these treatments may serve as a bridge for surgery or even postpone/avoid the procedure.

Aims
In this report, we aim to evaluate the response to TRA treatment in patients with ITP and associated side effects in our center.

Methods
Inclusion criteria: patients with ITP resistant to first line treatment. Patients characteristics, response to TRA, clinical evolution and adverse effects were evaluated by retrospective analysis.

Results
Thirty-eight patients with ITP were included: 31.4% (12) were male and the median age at diagnosis was 38 years. 44.7% (17) had relapsed/resistant disease after splenectomy and 13.2% (5) were treated with a TRA as a bridge for this procedure. Sixteen (42.1%) of ITP patients were treated with romiplostim: 12 patients (75%) had a response to treatment, and 4 (25%) were resistant. In 11 of these patients, romiplostim was replaced by eltrombopag, either because of resistant disease, or more convenient administration (oral therapy). Thirty-three (86.8%) patients were treated with eltrombopag (5 pediatric cases): 27 patients (81.8%) responded while 6 patients had resistant disease (3 of these were HIV positive). The response rate was higher in patients with previous splenectomy (91.7% with romiplostim and 92.9% with eltrombopag) compared to those with no previous splenectomy (25% with romiplostim and 73.7% with eltrombopag). Six patients maintained response after treatment suspension (5 treated with eltrombopag and 1 treated with romiplostim). Generally, both treatments were well tolerated, with only one case of eltrombopag suspension because of a thromboembolic event.

Conclusion
In the current study, both TRA were effective in the treatment of ITP resistant to several lines of treatment, with similar response rates. As described in the literature, the response rate was higher in patients with previous splenectomy, and some cases maintained response after treatment suspension.

The toxicity profile was acceptable. However, there are some concerns about their safety in long term therapy, namely the development of myelofibrosis, cytogenetic abnormalities and malignant evolution. Consequently, there is an urgent need for prospective studies to define the optimal period of treatment and surveillance, especially in pediatric patients.
In our center, the median time of treatment with eltrombopag for all patients was 5.5 months (range between 1 to 34 months) and with romiplostim was 12 months (range between 1.5 to 85 months). The duration of treatment with eltrombopag in children and adolescents was around 6 months.

Session topic: 32. Platelets disorders

Keyword(s): Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies