data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80f1b/80f1b8d2e3b53843c6c8094b9749e030e304ba30" alt="Dr. Hunan Julhakyan"
Contributions
Abstract: PB2071
Type: Publication Only
Background
Aims
The aim of our study to determine the immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IgVH) gene usage and somatic mutation patterns in a series of SMZL and SDRP patients.
Methods
Results
A comparison of the VH genes to reported germline sequences in SMZL revealed that 6 cases used the VH3 family VH gene segments, 2 the VH4 family, 16 the VH1 family segments. The VH1 family genes V1-2 were used in 16 cases. In 4 out of 24 cases (16.67%), IgVH genes were in germline or near germline configuration, whereas in 20 cases (83.33%), IgVH genes were somatically mutated. We have shown no differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics, immunophenotype, outcome or overall survival were found between the mutated and unmutated cases of SMZL. A comparison of the VH genes to reported germline sequences in SDRPL revealed that five cases used the VH3 family VH gene segments and five the VH4 family, one of case with unmutaited IgVH genes.
Conclusion
Our analysis also showed the selective use of VH1 family genes in a high proportion of SMZL cases (66.67%), while VH4 and VH3 family genes were represented at a lower frequency (8.33% and 25%, respectively). The present study may revealed that SMZL and SDRPL derive from different cellular origin and may use in differential diagnosis.
Session topic: 18. Non-Hodgkin & Hodgkin lymphoma - Biology
Keyword(s): Splenic marginal zone lymphoma, Mutation status, mutation analysis, VH gene
Abstract: PB2071
Type: Publication Only
Background
Aims
The aim of our study to determine the immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IgVH) gene usage and somatic mutation patterns in a series of SMZL and SDRP patients.
Methods
Results
A comparison of the VH genes to reported germline sequences in SMZL revealed that 6 cases used the VH3 family VH gene segments, 2 the VH4 family, 16 the VH1 family segments. The VH1 family genes V1-2 were used in 16 cases. In 4 out of 24 cases (16.67%), IgVH genes were in germline or near germline configuration, whereas in 20 cases (83.33%), IgVH genes were somatically mutated. We have shown no differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics, immunophenotype, outcome or overall survival were found between the mutated and unmutated cases of SMZL. A comparison of the VH genes to reported germline sequences in SDRPL revealed that five cases used the VH3 family VH gene segments and five the VH4 family, one of case with unmutaited IgVH genes.
Conclusion
Our analysis also showed the selective use of VH1 family genes in a high proportion of SMZL cases (66.67%), while VH4 and VH3 family genes were represented at a lower frequency (8.33% and 25%, respectively). The present study may revealed that SMZL and SDRPL derive from different cellular origin and may use in differential diagnosis.
Session topic: 18. Non-Hodgkin & Hodgkin lymphoma - Biology
Keyword(s): Splenic marginal zone lymphoma, Mutation status, mutation analysis, VH gene