EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

MODIFIED HYPERCVAD VERSUS BORTEZOMIB-HYPERCVAD IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA
Author(s): ,
Emma Scott
Affiliations:
Hematology and Oncology,Oregon Health and Science University,Portland,United States
,
Megan Saraceni
Affiliations:
Hematology and Oncology,Oregon Health and Science University,Portland,United States
,
Susie Jiing
Affiliations:
Hematology and Oncology,Oregon Health and Science University,Portland,United States
,
Solange Mongoue-Tchokote
Affiliations:
Hematology and Oncology,Oregon Health and Science University,Portland,United States
,
Richard Maziarz
Affiliations:
Hematology and Oncology,Oregon Health and Science University,Portland,United States
Eva Medvedova
Affiliations:
Hematology and Oncology,Oregon Health and Science University,Portland,United States
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Scott E. 05/18/17; 182681; PB1967
Emma Scott
Emma Scott
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB1967

Type: Publication Only

Background
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy, in which aggressive relapses may require salvage cytotoxic infusional chemotherapy. Several clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of bortezomib led to institutional practice changes where vincristine was replaced with bortezomib in the modified hyperCVAD (mod-CVAD) regimen, creating a new treatment regimen, ‘bortezomib-hyperCAD’ (bort-CVAD).

Aims
The primary objective is to describe the safety and efficacy of the hyperCVAD regimen with vincristine or bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory MM treated at Oregon Health and Science University.

Methods
IRB approval was obtained to perform this retrospective analysis. We describe the effectiveness and tolerability of the 2 regimens among 33 patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients who received > 1 cycle of mod-CVAD (n= 15) or bort-CVAD (n= 18) from Jan 1 2011 and Dec 31 2015 at the Knight Cancer Institute were included. Most patients were previously treated with/refractory to proteasome inhibitors (97%/76%) or immunomodulatory agents (82%/68%) respectively, 13 received prior autologous stem cell transplant (auto-HCT), the median number of prior lines was 3 (range 1-8). High risk cytogenetic factors t(4;14), t(14;16), or del 17p were present in 8 and extramedullary disease in 13 patients overall.

Regimens contained cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV every 12 hours for 8 doses; doxorubicin 9 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion every 24 hours and dexamethasone 40 mg by mouth on days 1-4; vincristine 0.4mg continuous IV infusion every 24 hours on days 1-4 (mod-CVAD) OR bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 SQ on day 1 and 4 (bort-CVAD). All patients received MESNA 350 mg/m2 IV every 24 hours on days 1 through 4; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 24-48 hours following the completion of chemotherapy; and standard infectious prophylaxis. International Myeloma Working Group uniform response and European Society for Blood and Marrow for minor response (MR) criteria were used.

Results
The median number of cycles given was 2 (range 1-6). Cycles were repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. Median follow up was 48 and 33 months in mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD respectively.

The ORR was 40% in the mod-CVAD group: 6 partial (PR), 6 minor (MR), and 3 stable disease (SD) compared to 44.4% in the bort-CVAD group: 1 complete response, 7 PR, 2 MR, 6 SD and 2 progressive disease (Fisher’s exact p = 0.80). A total of 13 patients proceeded to auto-HCT. Median progression-free and overall survival for all patients were 6 and 11 months respectively, which was comparable between arms (Log rank test p = 0.6635 and 0.7369).
New or worsening of peripheral neuropathy occurred in 2 and 4 patients in the mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD groups respectively. There was no statistically significant association between treatment and febrile neutropenia, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or peripheral neuropathy (Fisher’s exact test P value > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in safety and tolerability between treatment arms. Three and 6 patients in the mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD arms discontinued therapy due to toxicity or treatment complications respectively.

Conclusion
Overall effectiveness and safety outcomes were similar between mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD, with both regimens demonstrating an impressive response rate among heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory disease. This is a useful salvage strategy to gain rapid disease control; and as a bridge to other therapies including stem cell transplant and novel therapies.

Session topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical

Keyword(s): Salvage chemotherapy, Myeloma, Cyclophosphamide

Abstract: PB1967

Type: Publication Only

Background
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy, in which aggressive relapses may require salvage cytotoxic infusional chemotherapy. Several clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of bortezomib led to institutional practice changes where vincristine was replaced with bortezomib in the modified hyperCVAD (mod-CVAD) regimen, creating a new treatment regimen, ‘bortezomib-hyperCAD’ (bort-CVAD).

Aims
The primary objective is to describe the safety and efficacy of the hyperCVAD regimen with vincristine or bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory MM treated at Oregon Health and Science University.

Methods
IRB approval was obtained to perform this retrospective analysis. We describe the effectiveness and tolerability of the 2 regimens among 33 patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients who received > 1 cycle of mod-CVAD (n= 15) or bort-CVAD (n= 18) from Jan 1 2011 and Dec 31 2015 at the Knight Cancer Institute were included. Most patients were previously treated with/refractory to proteasome inhibitors (97%/76%) or immunomodulatory agents (82%/68%) respectively, 13 received prior autologous stem cell transplant (auto-HCT), the median number of prior lines was 3 (range 1-8). High risk cytogenetic factors t(4;14), t(14;16), or del 17p were present in 8 and extramedullary disease in 13 patients overall.

Regimens contained cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV every 12 hours for 8 doses; doxorubicin 9 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion every 24 hours and dexamethasone 40 mg by mouth on days 1-4; vincristine 0.4mg continuous IV infusion every 24 hours on days 1-4 (mod-CVAD) OR bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 SQ on day 1 and 4 (bort-CVAD). All patients received MESNA 350 mg/m2 IV every 24 hours on days 1 through 4; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 24-48 hours following the completion of chemotherapy; and standard infectious prophylaxis. International Myeloma Working Group uniform response and European Society for Blood and Marrow for minor response (MR) criteria were used.

Results
The median number of cycles given was 2 (range 1-6). Cycles were repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. Median follow up was 48 and 33 months in mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD respectively.

The ORR was 40% in the mod-CVAD group: 6 partial (PR), 6 minor (MR), and 3 stable disease (SD) compared to 44.4% in the bort-CVAD group: 1 complete response, 7 PR, 2 MR, 6 SD and 2 progressive disease (Fisher’s exact p = 0.80). A total of 13 patients proceeded to auto-HCT. Median progression-free and overall survival for all patients were 6 and 11 months respectively, which was comparable between arms (Log rank test p = 0.6635 and 0.7369).
New or worsening of peripheral neuropathy occurred in 2 and 4 patients in the mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD groups respectively. There was no statistically significant association between treatment and febrile neutropenia, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or peripheral neuropathy (Fisher’s exact test P value > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in safety and tolerability between treatment arms. Three and 6 patients in the mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD arms discontinued therapy due to toxicity or treatment complications respectively.

Conclusion
Overall effectiveness and safety outcomes were similar between mod-CVAD and bort-CVAD, with both regimens demonstrating an impressive response rate among heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory disease. This is a useful salvage strategy to gain rapid disease control; and as a bridge to other therapies including stem cell transplant and novel therapies.

Session topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical

Keyword(s): Salvage chemotherapy, Myeloma, Cyclophosphamide

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies