EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS IN NEUTROPENIC AND NON-NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANCY
Author(s): ,
Nadeem Raja
Affiliations:
Microbiology,East Sussex Healthcare Trust,Hastings,United Kingdom;Pathology,East Sussex Healthcare Trust,Hastings,United Kingdom
,
Sunil Gupta
Affiliations:
Haematology,East Sussex Healthcare Trust,Hastings,United Kingdom
Bill O'Neill
Affiliations:
Microbiology,East Sussex Healthcare Trust,Hastings,United Kingdom
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Raja N. 05/18/17; 182612; PB1898
Nadeem Raja
Nadeem Raja
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB1898

Type: Publication Only

Background
Blood stream infections (BSI) in patients with malignancies remain associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The choice of an empirical antibiotic regimen is usually based on the local epidemiology of the microorganisms and their antibiotimicrobial susceptibility profile. Antimicrobial guidelines for the management of sepsis in cancer patients in East Sussex Healthcare Trust (ESHT) recommend piperacillin/tazobactam as monotherapy and gentamicin is added in case of septic shock. Vancomycin is also added as a first line therapy if there is a suspicion of central line sepsis. Alternative therapies are ceftazidime or meropenem plus aminoglycoside.

Aims

We intend to review the aetiology of BSI and check the effectiveness of the antibiotics used in ESHT in cancer patients.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at ESHT from January 2006 to December 2015. Demographic and laboratory data were collected from the Pathology information system.

Results

A total of 640 episodes of BSI occurred in 297 patients (159 male). Of the 297 patients, 239 had haematology malignancies while 54 had solid organ tumour. Four patients had both. The neutrophil count was <1 cells/109 in 383 episodes and majority of BSI occurred in this group. A total of 802 organisms (477 and 325 organisms from neutropenic and non-neutropenic respectively) were isolated. Of 802, 406 Gram positive and 386 Gram negative organisms were isolated. Seven Mycobacterium species and three Candida species were isolated. Most common organisms in neutropenic patients were Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (22%), Klebsiella species (14%), Escherichia coli (13%), Streptococcus species (10%), Pseudomonas species (10%), Enterococcus species (8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). In non-neutropenic patients, CoNS (29%), Escherichia coli (11%), Pseudomonas species (8%), Streptococcus species (7%), and Klebsiella species (5%) were isolated. Figure1 summarises the most common organisms causing BSI. Twelve Glycopeptide resistant Enterococci were isolated. Four Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus were isolated. In addition, 15 Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase producing Gram negative bacilli were isolated. Among Gram negative organisms, more than 91% isolates were sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin and higher sensitivity rates (>96%) were recorded in gentamicin and meropenem. Table1
summarises the effectiveness of antibiotics used.
Table1. The sensitivity of antibiotic regimens used
Antibiotics
Sensitivity rates
Neutropenic patients
N=383
Non-neutropenic patients
N=257
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus gentamicin
98%
99%
Meropenem plus gentamicin
99%
100%
Ceftazidime plus gentamicin
99%
99%
Ciprofloxacin plus gentamicin
98%
99%

Conclusion

This study highlights an on-going trend towards Gram positive organisms causing BSI in cancer patients. The antimicrobial regimens used in ESHT are highly effective against commonly isolated organisms. An early diagnosis and timely administration of appropriate antibiotics are imperative in managing BSI. The identification and the antimicrobial susceptibility of the microorganisms causing BSI in cancer patients remain important to develop antimicrobial treatment strategies, and to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Session topic: 29. Infectious diseases, supportive care

Abstract: PB1898

Type: Publication Only

Background
Blood stream infections (BSI) in patients with malignancies remain associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The choice of an empirical antibiotic regimen is usually based on the local epidemiology of the microorganisms and their antibiotimicrobial susceptibility profile. Antimicrobial guidelines for the management of sepsis in cancer patients in East Sussex Healthcare Trust (ESHT) recommend piperacillin/tazobactam as monotherapy and gentamicin is added in case of septic shock. Vancomycin is also added as a first line therapy if there is a suspicion of central line sepsis. Alternative therapies are ceftazidime or meropenem plus aminoglycoside.

Aims

We intend to review the aetiology of BSI and check the effectiveness of the antibiotics used in ESHT in cancer patients.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at ESHT from January 2006 to December 2015. Demographic and laboratory data were collected from the Pathology information system.

Results

A total of 640 episodes of BSI occurred in 297 patients (159 male). Of the 297 patients, 239 had haematology malignancies while 54 had solid organ tumour. Four patients had both. The neutrophil count was <1 cells/109 in 383 episodes and majority of BSI occurred in this group. A total of 802 organisms (477 and 325 organisms from neutropenic and non-neutropenic respectively) were isolated. Of 802, 406 Gram positive and 386 Gram negative organisms were isolated. Seven Mycobacterium species and three Candida species were isolated. Most common organisms in neutropenic patients were Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (22%), Klebsiella species (14%), Escherichia coli (13%), Streptococcus species (10%), Pseudomonas species (10%), Enterococcus species (8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). In non-neutropenic patients, CoNS (29%), Escherichia coli (11%), Pseudomonas species (8%), Streptococcus species (7%), and Klebsiella species (5%) were isolated. Figure1 summarises the most common organisms causing BSI. Twelve Glycopeptide resistant Enterococci were isolated. Four Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus were isolated. In addition, 15 Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase producing Gram negative bacilli were isolated. Among Gram negative organisms, more than 91% isolates were sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin and higher sensitivity rates (>96%) were recorded in gentamicin and meropenem. Table1
summarises the effectiveness of antibiotics used.
Table1. The sensitivity of antibiotic regimens used
Antibiotics
Sensitivity rates
Neutropenic patients
N=383
Non-neutropenic patients
N=257
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus gentamicin
98%
99%
Meropenem plus gentamicin
99%
100%
Ceftazidime plus gentamicin
99%
99%
Ciprofloxacin plus gentamicin
98%
99%

Conclusion

This study highlights an on-going trend towards Gram positive organisms causing BSI in cancer patients. The antimicrobial regimens used in ESHT are highly effective against commonly isolated organisms. An early diagnosis and timely administration of appropriate antibiotics are imperative in managing BSI. The identification and the antimicrobial susceptibility of the microorganisms causing BSI in cancer patients remain important to develop antimicrobial treatment strategies, and to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Session topic: 29. Infectious diseases, supportive care

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies