EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL PROGNOSTIC INDEX FOR CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA, PROGRESSION-RISK SCORE AND MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER 2011 SCORE: REAL WORLD DATA FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION
Author(s): ,
Vojin Vukovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Darko Antic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia;Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Teodora Karan-Djurasevic
Affiliations:
Laboratory for Molecular Biomedicine,Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Natasa Milic
Affiliations:
Institute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Milena Todorovic-Balint
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia;Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Jelena Bila
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia;Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Bosko Andjelic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia;Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Vladislava Djurasinovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia;Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Aleksandra Sretenovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Mihailo Smiljanic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Jelena Jelicic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Marija Dencic-Fekete
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Maja Perunicic-Jovanovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Nada Kraguljac-Kurtovic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia
,
Sonja Pavlovic
Affiliations:
Laboratory for Molecular Biomedicine,Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering,Belgrade,Serbia
Biljana Mihaljevic
Affiliations:
Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia,Belgrade,Serbia;Medical Faculty,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
(Abstract release date: 05/18/17) EHA Library. Vukovic V. 05/18/17; 182507; PB1793
Dr. Vojin Vukovic
Dr. Vojin Vukovic
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: PB1793

Type: Publication Only

Background
In recent times, several powerful prognostic scores have been developed in order to predict time to first treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The international prognostic index for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL-IPI) developed by The International CLL-IPI working group was found to predict OS and TTFT, while the rest of two scores- progression-risk score (PRS) and MD Anderson Cancer Center Score 2011 (MDACC 2011) have been developed for prediction of TTFT in early stage CLL patients.

Aims
The aim of this study was to compare CLL-IPI, PRS and MDACC 2011 prognostic scores based on their impact on TTFT, treatment response (TR), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of 54 treated CLL patients.

Methods
We retrospectively analyzed data from 54 consecutive CLL patients diagnosed and treated at Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia from 2003 to 2013. Blood samples were prospectively collected and analyzed for biological and molecular features (IGHV, FISH and TP53), as well as standard laboratory parameters. The three scores were retrospectively calculated using formulas from the original articles (International CLL-IPI working group, Lancet Oncol 2016, for CLL-IPI; Gentile et al, Leukemia 2016, for PRS; and Wierda et al, J Clin Oncol 2011, for MDACC 2011 score), and, than, correlated with TTFT, TR, PFS and OS of patients from the studied cohort.

Results
Median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 38-75). All patients were treated with fludarabin-based chemotherapy, 45 (83%) in the first treatment line. Overall response rate to the first line therapy was 81%, equally distributed on complete and partial responses. Most of the patients (42, 78%) relapsed during the follow up. At the time of the last follow up 14 (26%) patients were still alive, 35 (65%) were dead, and 5 (9%) were lost to follow up. Median overal survival was 76 months.

Lower score values for all the three scoring systems (CLL-IPI, PRS, and MDACC 2011) correlated with longer TTFT (p<0.05 for all). Cox regression analysis revealed that CLL-IPI and PRS are significant predictors of TTFT (p=0.003, RR=1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7 and p=0.019, RR=1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9, respectively), while MDACC 2011 was of borderline significance (p=0.052). In the multivariable analysis PRS emerged as the most significant predictor of TTFT among the three examined scores (p=0.041, RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.01-1.81). Regarding TR, only PRS appeared to have borderline statistical significance (p=0.052), showing that patients with lower score value may achieve better TR. Lower CLL-IPI can predict longer PFS after the first line treatment (p=0.007, RR=1.7, 95%CI 1.2-2.57), as well as PRS (p=0.039, RR=1.8, 95%CI 1.03-3.1). MDACC 2011 has not shown to have influence on PFS. Multivariable analyisis confirmed PRS to have the strongest predictive value of all the three scores regarding duration of PFS (p=0.039, RR=1.8, 95%CI 1.02-3.1). Furthermore, CLL-IPI and PRS were found to be significant predictors of OS (p=0.005, RR=1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.8 and p=0.037, RR=1.5, 95%CI 1.03-2.24, respectively).

Conclusion
CLL-IPI and PRS were identified as significant predictors of TTFT, as well as of duration of TR and OS. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Session topic: 6. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related disorders - Clinical

Keyword(s): International prognostic index, Fludarabine, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Abstract: PB1793

Type: Publication Only

Background
In recent times, several powerful prognostic scores have been developed in order to predict time to first treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The international prognostic index for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL-IPI) developed by The International CLL-IPI working group was found to predict OS and TTFT, while the rest of two scores- progression-risk score (PRS) and MD Anderson Cancer Center Score 2011 (MDACC 2011) have been developed for prediction of TTFT in early stage CLL patients.

Aims
The aim of this study was to compare CLL-IPI, PRS and MDACC 2011 prognostic scores based on their impact on TTFT, treatment response (TR), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of 54 treated CLL patients.

Methods
We retrospectively analyzed data from 54 consecutive CLL patients diagnosed and treated at Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia from 2003 to 2013. Blood samples were prospectively collected and analyzed for biological and molecular features (IGHV, FISH and TP53), as well as standard laboratory parameters. The three scores were retrospectively calculated using formulas from the original articles (International CLL-IPI working group, Lancet Oncol 2016, for CLL-IPI; Gentile et al, Leukemia 2016, for PRS; and Wierda et al, J Clin Oncol 2011, for MDACC 2011 score), and, than, correlated with TTFT, TR, PFS and OS of patients from the studied cohort.

Results
Median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 38-75). All patients were treated with fludarabin-based chemotherapy, 45 (83%) in the first treatment line. Overall response rate to the first line therapy was 81%, equally distributed on complete and partial responses. Most of the patients (42, 78%) relapsed during the follow up. At the time of the last follow up 14 (26%) patients were still alive, 35 (65%) were dead, and 5 (9%) were lost to follow up. Median overal survival was 76 months.

Lower score values for all the three scoring systems (CLL-IPI, PRS, and MDACC 2011) correlated with longer TTFT (p<0.05 for all). Cox regression analysis revealed that CLL-IPI and PRS are significant predictors of TTFT (p=0.003, RR=1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7 and p=0.019, RR=1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9, respectively), while MDACC 2011 was of borderline significance (p=0.052). In the multivariable analysis PRS emerged as the most significant predictor of TTFT among the three examined scores (p=0.041, RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.01-1.81). Regarding TR, only PRS appeared to have borderline statistical significance (p=0.052), showing that patients with lower score value may achieve better TR. Lower CLL-IPI can predict longer PFS after the first line treatment (p=0.007, RR=1.7, 95%CI 1.2-2.57), as well as PRS (p=0.039, RR=1.8, 95%CI 1.03-3.1). MDACC 2011 has not shown to have influence on PFS. Multivariable analyisis confirmed PRS to have the strongest predictive value of all the three scores regarding duration of PFS (p=0.039, RR=1.8, 95%CI 1.02-3.1). Furthermore, CLL-IPI and PRS were found to be significant predictors of OS (p=0.005, RR=1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.8 and p=0.037, RR=1.5, 95%CI 1.03-2.24, respectively).

Conclusion
CLL-IPI and PRS were identified as significant predictors of TTFT, as well as of duration of TR and OS. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Session topic: 6. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related disorders - Clinical

Keyword(s): International prognostic index, Fludarabine, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies