EHA Library - The official digital education library of European Hematology Association (EHA)

ALTERATIONS OF BONE MARROW MICROENVIRONMENT IN PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS AT THE DIAGNOSIS AND DURING THE TREATMENT
Author(s): ,
Tamara Sorokina
Affiliations:
Bone Marrow Transplantation,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
,
Irina Shipounova
Affiliations:
Physiology of Hematopoiesis Lab,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
,
Alexey Bigildeev
Affiliations:
Physiology of Hematopoiesis Lab,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
,
Natalia Petinaty
Affiliations:
Physiology of Hematopoiesis Lab,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
,
Nina Drize
Affiliations:
Physiology of Hematopoiesis Lab,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
,
Larisa Kuzmina
Affiliations:
Bone Marrow Transplantation,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
,
Elena Parovichnikova
Affiliations:
Bone Marrow Transplantation,National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
Valery Savchenko
Affiliations:
National Research Center for Hematology,Moscow,Russian Federation
(Abstract release date: 05/19/16) EHA Library. Sorokina T. 06/09/16; 132685; E1136
Dr. Tamara Sorokina
Dr. Tamara Sorokina
Contributions
Abstract
Abstract: E1136

Type: Eposter Presentation

Background
Bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is involved in the initiation and propagation of normal hematopoiesis and hematological diseases. Leukemia and chemotherapy affect hematopoietic and stromal precursor cells. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MMSCs) are the essential element of hematopoietic microenvironment.

Aims
The study aimed to characterize MMSCs and their more differentiated progeny CFU-F derived from the BM of the patients with hematological disorders at diagnosis and during the treatment.

Methods
74 newly diagnosed cases (33 AML, 21 ALL, 20 CML) were involved in the study after informed consent. BM was aspirated prior to treatment (time-point 0) and at days 37, 100 and 180 since the beginning of treatment of acute leukemia and +3, +6 and +12 months for CML (time-points 1-3). MMSCs were cultured in aMEM with 10% fetal calf serum. Time to P0 and cumulative MMSC production after 3 passages were evaluated and CFU-F concentration was analyzed. The relative expression level (REL) of genes was measured by TaqMan RQ-PCR. As a control MMSCs and CFU-Fs from 88 healthy donors were used.

Results
Time needed to reach P0 reflects the quantity of MMSC in the BM sample. The time to P0 in control group was 13.7±0.3 days. Its elongation in acute leukemia cultures at the time of the diagnosis (table) suggested the reduction of MMSC number probably due to leukemic expansion, while the longer time to P0 at time-points 2 and 3 could be explained by the therapy influence. In CML cultures time to P0 was significantly longer during the whole observation period due to the continuous therapy and maintaining disease.Cumulative MMSC production in control group was 7.1±1 x 106 cells. In patients with AML it was 1/3 of the donor’s at the disease manifestation with no difference at time-points 1-3, indicating the impaired proliferative abilities of MMSC at the AML manifestation. Cumulative MMSC production in patients with ALL and CML didn’t differ from donor’s. BM blast count did not correlate with MMSC production.CFU-F concentration in the BM of acute leukemia patients was significantly lower than donor’s (25.4±3.1 per 106 cells) at the time-point 0 with no difference at time-points 1-3. CFU-F concentration in the BM of CML patients was also nearly 40% lower than in control group at the time-point 0 with its following restoration at time-point 1 and subsequent drop (up to 5 fold lower) at time-point 3, reflecting the long-lasting lesion of CFU-Fs during the course of the disease.Gene expression analysis of MMSC from all patients revealed significant decrease in REL of VEGF and SOX9 genes at the disease manifestation that did not restore after the treatment. The REL of LIF was significantly increased at the disease manifestation, reflecting the efforts of MMSCs to inhibit leukemic proliferation. REL of PDGFRB and IL6 increased during the treatment. The treatment lead to the downregulation of FGF2, TGFB1 and 2. As FGF2 and TGFB inhibit the differentiation of MMSCs, their downregulation may refer to the effectiveness of therapy. In MMSCs from acute leukemia patients the ICAM and SPP1 genes were downregulated at all points, reflecting the mechanism of the blocking of MMSCs migration and differentiation during the stress conditions. The influence of chemotherapy lead to decrease in REL of SDF1, IL8, VCAM, IL1b1R1, JAG1, IGF1, FGFR1 and 2.

Conclusion
The study supports the major influence of leukemic cells and chemotherapy on the BM microenvironment. The two types of studied precursors are affected differently. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of MMSCs in leukemia pathogenesis.



Session topic: E-poster

Keyword(s): Acute leukemia, Chronic myeloid leukemia, Mesenchymal stem cell, Microenvironment
Abstract: E1136

Type: Eposter Presentation

Background
Bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is involved in the initiation and propagation of normal hematopoiesis and hematological diseases. Leukemia and chemotherapy affect hematopoietic and stromal precursor cells. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MMSCs) are the essential element of hematopoietic microenvironment.

Aims
The study aimed to characterize MMSCs and their more differentiated progeny CFU-F derived from the BM of the patients with hematological disorders at diagnosis and during the treatment.

Methods
74 newly diagnosed cases (33 AML, 21 ALL, 20 CML) were involved in the study after informed consent. BM was aspirated prior to treatment (time-point 0) and at days 37, 100 and 180 since the beginning of treatment of acute leukemia and +3, +6 and +12 months for CML (time-points 1-3). MMSCs were cultured in aMEM with 10% fetal calf serum. Time to P0 and cumulative MMSC production after 3 passages were evaluated and CFU-F concentration was analyzed. The relative expression level (REL) of genes was measured by TaqMan RQ-PCR. As a control MMSCs and CFU-Fs from 88 healthy donors were used.

Results
Time needed to reach P0 reflects the quantity of MMSC in the BM sample. The time to P0 in control group was 13.7±0.3 days. Its elongation in acute leukemia cultures at the time of the diagnosis (table) suggested the reduction of MMSC number probably due to leukemic expansion, while the longer time to P0 at time-points 2 and 3 could be explained by the therapy influence. In CML cultures time to P0 was significantly longer during the whole observation period due to the continuous therapy and maintaining disease.Cumulative MMSC production in control group was 7.1±1 x 106 cells. In patients with AML it was 1/3 of the donor’s at the disease manifestation with no difference at time-points 1-3, indicating the impaired proliferative abilities of MMSC at the AML manifestation. Cumulative MMSC production in patients with ALL and CML didn’t differ from donor’s. BM blast count did not correlate with MMSC production.CFU-F concentration in the BM of acute leukemia patients was significantly lower than donor’s (25.4±3.1 per 106 cells) at the time-point 0 with no difference at time-points 1-3. CFU-F concentration in the BM of CML patients was also nearly 40% lower than in control group at the time-point 0 with its following restoration at time-point 1 and subsequent drop (up to 5 fold lower) at time-point 3, reflecting the long-lasting lesion of CFU-Fs during the course of the disease.Gene expression analysis of MMSC from all patients revealed significant decrease in REL of VEGF and SOX9 genes at the disease manifestation that did not restore after the treatment. The REL of LIF was significantly increased at the disease manifestation, reflecting the efforts of MMSCs to inhibit leukemic proliferation. REL of PDGFRB and IL6 increased during the treatment. The treatment lead to the downregulation of FGF2, TGFB1 and 2. As FGF2 and TGFB inhibit the differentiation of MMSCs, their downregulation may refer to the effectiveness of therapy. In MMSCs from acute leukemia patients the ICAM and SPP1 genes were downregulated at all points, reflecting the mechanism of the blocking of MMSCs migration and differentiation during the stress conditions. The influence of chemotherapy lead to decrease in REL of SDF1, IL8, VCAM, IL1b1R1, JAG1, IGF1, FGFR1 and 2.

Conclusion
The study supports the major influence of leukemic cells and chemotherapy on the BM microenvironment. The two types of studied precursors are affected differently. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of MMSCs in leukemia pathogenesis.



Session topic: E-poster

Keyword(s): Acute leukemia, Chronic myeloid leukemia, Mesenchymal stem cell, Microenvironment

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies